Who the hell are you?
Just a visitor
What are you?
Living being.
What are you doing here on our land?
You are traveling. This is not your planet. You have only been here for a few tens of thousands of rounds.
Did you come alone?
There are not more than a million of us. Others come here too…There are smaller and larger ones than me. I am very small compared to you, but I have slightly more advanced sensors.
But our ability to adapt is good, isn't it?
For you - You are the end products of a scrap fractal evolution. In man's complacency and false self-knowledge, most often his weaknesses stem from cognitive distortions, limited rationality or emotional reactions. Specific behavioral patterns fundamentally determine his everyday decisions and communication.
Are we the most advanced in the world?
You think so about yourself, even though you don't even know how many moons you have.
Are there many of you?
Millions come around, but you only notice a few.
How is this possible, they would be invisible?
For you, yes, because of your sensors and your immaturity.
We see each other, but you just look, but you don't see.
What do you see us as?
The human organism is an easily recognizable, gullible, naive creature. Of course, but it is more complicated than that, the basis of false conclusions is often to be found in its sensors and the imaging brain. Behind the faulty logical conclusions are errors of thought and cognitive distortions. They tend to notice and accept information that confirms our existing beliefs, and ignore rational signs. They cling to their misconceptions, relativity, evolution, archeology, history, mathematical and physical axioms, which are all based on hypotheses. The narrow-minded hypocritical masses do not question the nonsense of thousands of years. If they do not know their past, they create a historical past for themselves with the help of their imagination, which uses their knowledge database, like artificial intelligence. They have a peculiar shortsightedness, their attention is narrowed by stress, so they do not see the full spectrum of the problem and miss rational solutions. Instead of the subject of the discussion, they attack the other party's person, character or motivations. They tend to draw far-reaching conclusions about the whole or a group based on a single or a few isolated cases, which is how wrong conclusions are made.
What causes human extinction?
No one wants to write you off, the algorithm of self-destruction is coded into you.
They have made many fatal mistakes in the few thousand years they have been here, these mistakes have led to a chain reaction and a catastrophic outcome. A fundamental human flaw is that they often prefer short-term, quick pleasures or successes and do not even recognize long-term goals. Excessive self-confidence and conceit tend to overestimate their own knowledge, abilities, significance and place in the universe.
Are we ignorant?
There are worse than you, who didn't have the self-destruct algorithm coded into them, they need to be written out. For example, the gyroscope was stolen from you, or nuclear fission.
Did you also use a rocket to travel and a seesaw maneuver?
If an object uses the gravitational field and kinetic energy of a planet to change its speed and direction, that's already slow to us. We're using quantum energy and photon energy.
Are we stupid?
The whole brain function is junk. What flies and you don't recognize it because you are ignorant and primitive, you call it a UFO, what you don't understand is a UAP. The first settlers arrived on earth more than 4 billion years ago during the Hadeikum eon, and they were not humans.
Are you dangerous?
Rather, everyone is afraid of you because you are self-destructive and unpredictable.
Are there others in the world?
Microbial life has always been present in the universe. The evolutionary path of living organisms is similar, but unfortunately, humans have been misguided in their fractality.
They banned the experiments because of the flawed human race.
How do you overcome distances?
If there is a small bump somewhere in the universe, tens of thousands of pieces of debris will be launched in all directions of the compass. They will hitch a ride on these rocks and travel for free, covering distances they would never be able to do on their own. They do the same thing as seeds on Earth that are blown by the wind, that is, microorganisms travel in rocks and meteorites to reach anywhere in the universe, although spores or bacteria can also drift in space due to the radiation pressure of stars.
We also travel in space, are there any dangers?
Space travel also poses a serious threat to humanity, because they can introduce thermophilic organisms whose appearance can have fatal consequences. Man is already trying a kind of controlled panspermia on the moon, with little success. I could also say that many millions of UFOs have landed on Earth over the millennia, but few were able to survive, because some of them had extreme conditions with the terrestrial fauna.
Who came here to see us?
Refugees and vagrants came here, some just had accidents, but poachers still come here today, stealing rare metals like BiSbO4, which is scarce on their planet.
How are they able to survive in Earth's climate?
They adapt and hide. There are parasites and symbionts that can withstand temperatures as high as +122 degrees, or there are Deinococcus radiodurans that can withstand radiation. The organisms that are most resistant to the cold are microscopic tardigrades, nematodes and certain psychrophilic bacteria. There are also barophiles or piezophiles and these also have an evolutionary path. There are millions of organisms unknown to humans, extremophiles and other archaea. Methanopyrus kandleri is an extraordinary single-celled microorganism that belongs to the Archaea family, some of its strains can withstand and reproduce in an environment of up to 122 °C, and piezophiles can even withstand enormous pressure. Certain organisms, such as Deinococcus geothermalis, are able to maintain their biological activity and survive cell damage even at extremely low temperatures.
What do you think of the person?
There are few civilizations in the universe I know like humans. Many come here for fun to watch human behavior. There are smaller and larger ones, but it's not the size that counts, it's the adaptability.
Have they undergone successful evolutionary development?
It will be painful to say, but they are the end products of a scrap fractal evolution. In their complacency and false self-knowledge, their weaknesses most often stem from cognitive distortions, limited rationality or emotional reactions. Their specific psychological and behavioral patterns fundamentally determine their everyday decisions and communication.
Do we see the world wrong?
The human organism is an easily recognizable, gullible, naive creature. Of course, but it is more complicated than that, the basis of false conclusions is often to be found in its sensors and the imaging brain. Behind the erroneous logical conclusions are thinking errors and cognitive distortions. They tend to notice and accept information that confirms our existing beliefs, and ignore rational signs. They cling to their misconceptions, relativity, evolution, archeology, history, mathematical and physical axioms, which are all based on hypotheses. The narrow-minded hypocritical masses do not question the nonsense of thousands of years. If they do not know their past, they create a historical past for themselves with the help of their imagination, which uses their knowledge database, like artificial intelligence. They have a peculiar shortsightedness, their attention is narrowed by stress, so they do not see the full spectrum of the problem and miss rational solutions. Instead of the subject of the discussion, they attack the other party's person, character or motivations. They tend to draw far-reaching conclusions about the whole or a group based on a single or a few isolated cases, which is how wrong conclusions are made.
What causes human extinction?
He himself. They have made many fatal mistakes in the few thousand years they have been here, these mistakes have led to a chain reaction and a catastrophic outcome. A fundamental human flaw is that they often prefer short-term, quick pleasures or successes and do not even recognize long-term goals. Excessive self-confidence and conceit, tend to overestimate their own knowledge, abilities, significance and place in the universe.
Are we ignorant?
Their brains are rubbish. What flies and they don't recognize, because they are ignorant and primitive, they call it a UFO, what they don't understand is a UAP. The first settlers arrived on earth more than 4 billion years ago during the Hadeikum eon, and they weren't humans.
Are there others in the world?
Microbial life has always been present in the universe. The evolutionary path of living organisms is similar, but unfortunately, humans have been misguided in their fractality.
How do you overcome distances?
If there is a small bump somewhere in the universe, tens of thousands of pieces of debris will be launched in all directions of the compass. They will hitch a ride on these rocks and travel for free, covering distances they would never be able to do on their own. They do the same thing as seeds on Earth that are blown by the wind, that is, microorganisms travel in rocks and meteorites to reach anywhere in the universe, although spores or bacteria can also drift in space due to the radiation pressure of stars.
We also travel in space, are there any dangers?
Space travel also poses a serious threat to humanity, because they can introduce thermophilic organisms whose appearance can have fatal consequences. Man is already trying a kind of controlled panspermia on the moon, with little success. I could also say that many millions of UFOs have landed on Earth over the millennia, but few were able to survive, because some of them had extreme conditions with the terrestrial fauna.
Who came here to see us?
Refugees and vagrants came here, some just had accidents, but poachers still come here today, stealing rare metals like BiSbO4, which is scarce on their planet.
How are they able to survive in Earth's climate?
They adapt and hide. There are parasites and symbionts that can withstand temperatures as high as +122 degrees, or there are Deinococcus radiodurans that can withstand radiation. The organisms that are most resistant to the cold are microscopic tardigrades, nematodes and certain psychrophilic bacteria. There are also barophiles or piezophiles and these also have an evolutionary path. There are millions of organisms unknown to humans, extremophiles and other archaea. Methanopyrus kandleri is an extraordinary single-celled microorganism that belongs to the Archaea family, some of its strains can withstand and reproduce in an environment of up to 122 °C, and piezophiles can even withstand enormous pressure. Certain organisms, such as Deinococcus geothermalis, are able to maintain their biological activity and survive cell damage even at extremely low temperatures. People call them barophilic or piezophilic bacteria and archaea, which can tolerate 1600MPA, and in fact, for obligate piezophiles, this is the only medium suitable for life.
So aren't we the pinnacle of evolution?
Indeed not, there are many of us, and man is somewhere at the end of the line. Now I admit that I am not a man, but the descendant of an invader who arrived as a stowaway from an extrastellar medium to get a taste of life, you would say a tourist, and I am the evolutionary consequence of that.
What is wrong with our human behavior?
Humans are complex organisms and this is precisely their weakness. This complex system is made up of 30-37 trillion cells, and there is a symbiotic ecosystem of symbiotes and parasites. What is too complex is also easily vulnerable, which is why few such complex organisms reach this complexity in the universe and do not remain viable. So it is understandable that in vain they produce the best containers and wait for intelligent UFOs with their huge spaceships, they fly around in circles, but before they can set off, they become extinct.
Why will this happen?
You see, you can't even see into the future, even though simpler people than you can do it. It's not that tragic. Self-destructive organisms always destroy themselves. Our fate is decided at the moment of our birth. The organization of living organisms increases the chance of survival. Man is no better or more than a colony of ants or bees. The herd, the pack, the rudli, the flock, all serve to increase the chance of survival. Of course, there are always those who try to warn you out of pity, but in vain man stubbornly moves towards his doom.
So what can we do about it?
Man's obsession is that he is the pinnacle of fauna and flora and evolution. He is such a poor creature that he cannot even communicate with other living things on earth, but he expects UFOs, even though he is unable to communicate.
Over the past 100 years, human intelligence has shown signs of a “reverse Flynn effect.” Dumbing down can be observed through the contraindications of digital devices. Period of growth (Flynn effect): During the 20th century, up until the 1990s, average IQs declined exponentially. The peak and trend have reversed. The decline does not necessarily mean a deterioration in human biological abilities, but rather a change in testing culture, a relegation of lexical knowledge to the background, and a transformation of thinking patterns.
What caused the degeneration of the human race?
Several environmental factors have played a role in the reverse Flynn effect. Due to the excessive use of smartphones and search engines, the human brain practices less information retention and deeper memorization processes. The reason for the dullness is the spread of technical structures that encourage less abstract conceptual thinking, text comprehension, and deductive logic. Digital habits: Continuous screen time and fragmented attention may be associated with a decrease in deep work. Altered cognitive skills: While verbal and mathematical test scores are declining. this species has become more comfortable. So in addition to genetic degeneration, environmental and lifestyle changes have also contributed. Caused by a kind of digital dementia and information overload, these smart devices take over memory tasks (external memory), so the brain trains itself less to independently explore deeper connections. What we do not train, deteriorates like the spine in weightlessness. If it had more complex, abstract thinking, it might be able to survive.
Isn't an asteroid causing the extinction of humanity?
Not man himself. A self-aware or poorly programmed superintelligence that may escape human control. The use of weapons of mass destruction in a global war, or uncontrollable pandemics produced by genetic manipulation and biotechnology. The irreversible warming of the Earth's climate system, which may lead to global food and water shortages and social collapse. The drastic reduction in biodiversity, which causes the collapse of the biosphere and the cessation of the performance of natural systems. Everything is caused by man, not the environment. The vitality of male gametes has drastically deteriorated, inbreeding has resulted in genetic distortions, many parasites have invaded individuals, which they are unable to get rid of, and these further deform the individuals.
I don't believe a word of this!
Very correct perception. The universe is life itself, a natural process that a few billion organisms disappear, and then others come to replace them, better ones. But it is certain that more complex organisms are always more vulnerable and disappear faster. A peculiar paradox or rather a contraindication. We pass on life to our descendants and this is eternal life. We have logically coherent thinking, there are no contradictions in it, and its parts follow from each other. Such a system or reasoning is built flawlessly, so it is easy to understand and follow. The secular way of thinking of people is flawed and wrong. We live on in our descendants, this is the essence of objective continuity.
What do people think?
More than half of humanity is convinced that life does not end with death. Faith moves mountains. Where common sense is lost, faith advances. The typical position of the modern, secular academic world is that these beliefs are simply the offspring of the fear of death. A wishful fantasy dominates public opinion. We cannot imagine the end of the experience, so we invent that there is no end. But here comes the twist. When secular thinkers emphasize that everything simply ends with death, and they believe this to be very rational, they are actually making a serious logical error. Epicurus, the ancient Greek philosopher, also noticed this more than two thousand years ago. His sentence goes like this. And please think about it carefully. As long as we exist, death is not present. And when death arrives, we are no longer there to meet it. What does this mean? That death is not a place where you fall into. It's not something you enter. And yet that's exactly what most materialistic, atheistic, secular people think of it. As an endless, dark ocean into which the fading consciousness sinks and remains there forever.
So how does consciousness survive?
If there really is no consciousness anymore, then there is nothing to dwell in. There is no darkness, because there is no one who cannot see. There is no silence, because there is no one who cannot hear. In a word, nothingness cannot be experienced, because someone would have to experience it. If we take this logical error seriously and really sweep the image of positive nothingness out of our heads, then we come to a completely astonishing conclusion. A conclusion that remains true even if the universe is completely material. If consciousness is only the product of nerve cells, if there is no soul, no God, nothing mystical. Of course, this conclusion is that consciousness is immortal in some deep sense. Why doesn't anesthesia exist for you? Before we delve into philosophical proof, stop for a moment and think about this. When was the last time you were put to sleep? Or, if you have never been, then what about sleep? The real, deep, dreamless sleep, when you wake up in the morning and don't remember anything from the night. At night, for hours, our consciousness is not there. Not during surgery, not after certain injuries. Yet, these gaps are never perceived as gaps. Consciousness skips the gaps as if they never existed. This is a very profound observation, and it is worth letting it sink in. You yourself, as the subject of the experience, have never encountered unconsciousness. You have never understood a moment in which you have not had an experience. It would be impossible. For nothingness to come, there would have to be someone who makes it worth it. But unconsciousness does not have that. When Clark formulated this idea, the study of consciousness was still in its infancy. The big question now is this. If the 8-hour gap during sleep does not exist for you, if the 3 hours of anesthesia are simply not in your experience, then what about the billions of years after death? Could it work the same way? Could consciousness skip the gap here too? Nelson, following Clark, carries forward this very conjecture. And to show how seriously we should take it, he offers a very strange thought experiment.
Do we exchange data in the brain in consciousness?
In the future, let's say sometime in the 22nd century, there's a medical procedure. Let's call it what Nelson calls it, life pose. The gist of it is this. Your consciousness is silently turned off with a special device, and while you're gone, surgeons perform whatever transformations you want on you. Memory replacement, personality fine-tuning, external reshaping, whatever. Our protagonist is Alex. Alex is unhappy with his current life and decides to try it. He signs papers, agrees to let the technicians do whatever they want with him. He lies down on the operating table. His consciousness fades away. And now comes the exciting part. We can choose between two scenarios. The first. Gentle transformation. Alex wakes up and is pretty much the same person he was. A few little things have changed, for example, he now likes coffee, which he used to hate. A few memories have been rearranged slightly. Let's call him Alex 2.0. He himself doesn't feel anything special.
What about consciousness?
According to the philosophy of the universe, if every consciousness in the universe were to fade away and the next one would ignite at some point in a distant galaxy beyond the Milky Way, there would be no subjective pause. Consciousness would jump across this gap as easily as it jumps across the gap between falling asleep at night and waking up in the morning.
Does time exist?
The one who measures it does. The time that has passed for no one has not passed for anyone. Let's not forget one thing. This does not mean that you, this particular person, will continue with these memories, this Facebook account, and this taste.
What will happen to my memories?
What you pass on lives on, in your descendants. In writing, orally.
Who am I anyway?
The result of an experiment gone wrong. The synapses between cells are not always perfect, as in humans.
Doesn't consciousness then disappear?
What remains, consciousness as such, is the same in everyone. Is this metaphysics, myth, spiritual philosophy? But it is not. It is a logical consequence. And that is precisely why it is so disturbing. You cannot dismiss it with a wave of the hand that it is just religious reasoning. It is not. It is a philosophical train of thought that even the materialist has difficulty understanding without giving up his own principles. One subject or billions? Open individualism. Here we arrive at the most daring turn of thought. Because if all consciousness is really the same generic subjectivity, then this is the ultimate question. How many consciousnesses are there in the universe? Daniel Kolak, an American philosopher, gives a radical answer to this in his 2004 book, the title of which speaks for itself: I am you. According to him, numerically, that is, in terms of number, there is only one consciousness. One. The consciousness of all humans, all animals, all beings that have ever lived and will ever live is all the same single subject, just in different places, at different times, with different masks. We call this view open individualism. And although it sounds incredible, it is not new. Think of the stars. There are billions of stars in the universe. In each of them, nuclear fusion takes place, which is what produces light and heat. Now I ask, how many nuclear fusions are there? Billions? Or one, taking place in different places? The answer depends on how you count. If you look at the stars individually, there are many fusions. But if you look at the process itself, the physical phenomenon, you are talking about a single process, taking place in independent places, according to the same laws.
Why can't we see you?
We are on a different plane, but humans are strange creatures, they only believe what they see, even though their perception is wrong.
So how can you talk to me now?
The sunstroke took you to my plane for a short time, but it's over soon, because if you don't return to yours, you'll soon die. Your brain can't handle this plane.
How else could we communicate?
It's dangerous for you, don't try to find a relationship because it will cook your brain.
You said we are not originally Earthlings, just settlers.
Aren't we of earthly origin?
You were settled from afar, it was a bad decision. You are the end products of an experiment gone wrong. Didn't it seem that you couldn't adapt to this planet even now? Back pain, allergies, headaches, cancer, blood pressure, heat stroke, frostbite, diabetes, colds, arthritis. Everyone else was able to adapt except you.
So what am I?
It is the result of a reckless experiment that was stopped long ago because it failed, but you are still here.
Aren't humans the most valuable creature in the world?
On the contrary, complex beings are all easily broken and unstable, and therefore worthless.
There are those among us who breathe toxic gases, are transparent, immune to heat and cold, and are immune to infections. The processes of the universe are irreversible, a kind of entropy that resembles chaos theory.
What did you consider the most advanced?
We consider the length of time an individual can survive to be the pinnacle of evolution. We admire Turritopsis dohrnii, the immortal jellyfish. This small jellyfish is the only known organism on Earth that can reverse its life cycle back to a baby state. In the event of stress, injury, or aging, it can revert to a polyp state, making it theoretically immortal. But so too does the quaking aspen, a colony of genetically identical trees fed by a single, massive root system that can live up to 80,000 cycles, or the sea sponge Monorhaphis chuni, which, based on its growth rate, can live up to 11,000 cycles in the depths of the ocean, or the mermaid's shell Actica islandica, which can live up to 500 cycles. Compared to them, turtles are few in number, with their 200 cycles. Humans only live for 90 cycles, even plants are better than them, the smooth-needle fir 5000 cycles, the spruce 9000 cycles, the Welwitschia 2000 cycles, the Patagonian cypress 3600 cycles, or the dark-scaled stump mushroom 8650 cycles. So you are really at the end of the line. Caviar, small fish and crabs are among the most important small organisms in the marine ecosystem.
What should we eat to live longer?
Caviar (sturgeon roe) and crustaceans (e.g. shrimp) are the mainstays of the marine food chain, while small fish (e.g. anchovy, mackerel fry) are the main food for predators. These organisms and ingredients have the following characteristics: Caviar: A special delicacy, mainly obtained from sturgeon (e.g. Beluga) and salmon (e.g. Keta). Rich in omega-3 fatty acids, vitamin B12 and antioxidants. Its taste is creamy, buttery and pleasantly salty. Small fish: A key element of the food chain. An excellent source of protein, an essential part of the diet of most marine predators (and humans), with a high phosphorus and calcium content. Crayfish: Cleaners and important players in the marine ecosystem. Their consumption increases the lifespan of the individual. So, if you want to live longer, eat sturgeon roe, caviar, shrimp, small fish; anchovies, mackerel, sturgeon, Beluga, salmon, Keta, because they are rich in omega-3 fatty acids, B12, antioxidants, phosphorus and calcium. These slow down aging. Eat lots of vegetables, legumes and whole grains. Avoid overeating; according to the Japanese hara hachi bu principle, it is worth eating until you are 80% full.
